The Dark Room
Why Do Women Read Dark Romance? The Psychology Behind the Fantasy
Why do women read dark romance and spicy romance? A dark romance writer responds to Aydin Paladin's 'The Secret Psychology of Women's Romantic Fantasies', on escapism, imagination, feminism and fantasy.
Aydin Paladin’s The Secret Psychology of Women’s Romantic Fantasies (July 2026) opens with a question designed to make you wince: are women addicted to smut? Do women, as she puts it, have a problem?
It’s a fifty-minute deep dive, and to her credit it’s packed with actual research rather than vibes. She walks through sales figures, reader surveys, arousal studies, evolutionary psychology and the rise of AI boyfriends. I’d call it more analytical than hostile, but the framing leans sceptical, and a few of her conclusions are worth pushing back on.
Here’s the thing, though. Read the research she presents carefully and it ends up making a pretty strong case for romance readers. Let me show you what I mean.
The numbers: romance isn’t a niche, it’s the main event
The video starts with scale. Romance, she points out, now accounts for around a third of fiction sales in the US by the estimates she cites, and spicy fantasy titles like Onyx Storm have broken sales records. Much of it is explicit, sitting behind tasteful, minimalist covers that blend into the fantasy shelves. Her phrase for it is “hiding in plain sight”.
I’d put it differently. It isn’t hiding. It’s winning. When a third of fiction buyers want something, that isn’t a guilty secret, it’s the mainstream. The only reason it ever felt hidden is that the things women love have a long history of being sneered at. Romance has always paid the publishing industry’s bills while being told it isn’t real literature.
What the research actually says readers want
This is where the video gets interesting, and where I think it quietly undercuts its own scary opening question.
She covers a survey of women who read erotic fiction. Most read often, many talk about their books openly with friends and partners, and embarrassment came a very distant last when they described how reading made them feel. The biggest reason they gave for reading was escapism. What they enjoyed most was positive excitement. And breaking social taboos? That ranked lowest.
She then covers studies on Fifty Shades readers, where very few said the BDSM was the thing they liked most, and on women’s preferences more broadly, where rough or violent content was the smallest group. Her own summary is that women aren’t mainly seeking unusual sex acts at all. They’re seeking emotionally engaging stories, with the relationship at the centre.
Read that back. Women read openly, without shame, for escape and excitement, and it’s the relationship they’re there for. That’s not a problem. That’s literally the definition of a love story.
So when people claim dark romance readers secretly want abuse, the evidence in this very video points the other way. The darkness is the seasoning. The obsession, the devotion, the feeling of being chosen: that’s the meal.
Imagination is the whole point
My favourite section is about why written fiction suits so many readers. She describes research where women talked about editing their experience as they read: skipping bits they didn’t like, rewriting scenes in their heads, filling the gaps with their own preferences. She suggests that mental engagement seems to come first, and attraction follows.
As a writer, this rings completely true. A book isn’t a finished product you watch. It’s a collaboration. I give you the shape of a scene and you supply the rest, his voice, the room, the exact way he says your name.
She also floats the idea that “blank” heroines like Bella Swan or Anastasia Steele might be deliberate, easier for readers to step into. I’d add that the dark hero does the same job from the other side. That’s part of why I write Zade Masked the way I do. A man in a mask is the ultimate space for imagination. You never quite see his face, so he becomes whoever you need him to be in the dark.
The “hypocrisy” question
The video spends a while on what it calls a contradiction: lots of readers describe themselves as feminists, yet love stories about dominant billionaires, dangerous men and unequal power. She suggests some of that may be hypocrisy, while also offering a gentler explanation, that political beliefs and fantasy may simply run on different tracks.
I’d go much further than the gentle version. There’s no contradiction at all. Feminism, as most women I know understand it, is about choice and freedom, including the freedom to fantasise about whatever you want without being judged for it. Wanting to be overpowered on the page doesn’t mean wanting it at work, at the ballot box or in your actual relationship. If anything, a book is the safest place to explore those feelings, because you’re the one who chose it, you set the pace, and you can close it any time.
She makes a good comparison herself: millions of people love fantasy role-playing games, but very few would swap antibiotics and indoor plumbing for real medieval life. Exactly. Fantasy has never been a manifesto. That’s what makes it fantasy.
Evolutionary psychology: one lens, not the whole picture
The evolutionary section argues that women’s fantasies focus on long-term partners who can invest and protect, which is why the stories centre on one intensely committed man. The video’s own example is that Christian Grey’s helicopter is really just an advertisement for status and resources.
It’s an interesting lens, and she’s careful to say these theories are still theoretical. But it can make readers sound like walking instinct. When a reader falls for a dark hero, she’s not doing maths on his helicopter. She’s falling for the feeling of being seen: someone who notices everything about her, who would cross any line for her, whose whole terrifying focus lands on her. That’s storytelling and emotion, not just biology. Reducing it to mate selection misses why these stories make people cry, laugh and stay up until 3am.
So, do women have a problem?
No. Women have a genre. A huge, profitable, creative one that the research suggests they read openly, joyfully and with their imaginations fully switched on. The only “problem” is how long it’s taken the rest of the world to take that seriously.
If you want to see what all that imagination can do with a masked man who watches far too closely, come and read Zade Masked on Patreon. And for weekly dark romance picks, psychology deep dives and pieces like this, join the newsletter at zademasked.com.
FAQ
Why do women read dark romance?
Readers most often say they read for escapism and excitement. Research covered in Aydin Paladin’s video suggests it’s the emotional relationship that draws readers in, with the darker elements adding intensity rather than being the main attraction.
Is it hypocritical to be a feminist and love dark romance?
No. Fantasy and real-life values are different things. Feminism is about freedom of choice, and that includes choosing what you enjoy reading and imagining.
Do dark romance readers want those things in real life?
Generally, no. Readers use fiction to explore feelings safely, the same way people enjoy horror films or fantasy games without wanting to live them.
Source video: The Secret Psychology of Women's Romantic Fantasies by Aydin Paladin (YouTube). Quotes and paraphrases are brief, for commentary.
More from the Dark Room
-
Zade Meadows: who he is, the books he’s in, and why the mask works
A spoiler-light guide to the masked hero of H. D. Carlton’s Haunting Adeline.
-
Is Dark Romance Harmful? A Dark Romance Writer Answers the Critics
Is dark romance harmful, or just misunderstood? A dark romance writer responds to MissWeiWei's 'Dark Romance is Corn For Women?' on fantasy, consent, addiction claims and why fiction isn't endorsement.
-
The History of Dark Romance: From Wuthering Heights to Haunting Adeline
Dark romance isn't new. A dark romance writer builds on Shanspeare's 'Dark Romance: Love, Desire…Oppression?' to trace the genre's history from gothic novels, the Brontës and du Maurier to BookTok.
-
The mask is the point
A first-person essay on masked-hero dark romance. Why the reveal is often the moment the book gets smaller, and what I want instead.
-
Dark is not a spice level
Spice and darkness are different scores. An essay on why “dark romance” is not a synonym for explicit, and how to use a warning page.
Essays are opinion. They are not a substitute for an author’s own warning note. Patreon · Ko-fi · Library